Discover how we've helped software teams overcome critical challenges
See how DuranteOS delivers measurable improvements across key conformance and velocity metrics
GateD caught 23 compliance gaps before production—Spec Studio made our regulatory requirements executable
The Context Manager gave our distributed team a single source of truth. No more 'I thought the spec said...' conversations
Conformance Center dashboard shows exactly where we're drifting from spec. It's like CI for requirements, not just code
Real feedback from teams using DuranteOS in production
We were burning through $3M annually on failed AI initiatives. Our team was demoralized, and I was losing credibility with the board. Every vendor promised the moon but delivered chaos.
Today, all our AI projects launch on time and on spec. Our development velocity increased 3x, and we've saved $4.5M in prevented failures. The board now sees AI as our strategic advantage.
Key Results:
Sarah Chen
CTO
FinanceHub Inc
Marcus Rodriguez
VP of Engineering at HealthTech Solutions
Challenge:
Our AI initiatives were siloed, expensive, and unpredictable. We had 4 different teams building similar solutions, wasting resources and creating technical debt.
Solution:
We now have a cohesive AI strategy, reusable components, and predictable delivery. Our time-to-market dropped from 9 months to 6 weeks for new AI features.
Results:
Jennifer Park
Chief Technology Officer at RetailAI Corp
Challenge:
We were locked into an expensive AI vendor whose solution didn't scale. Every change request cost $100K+ and took months. We felt trapped.
Solution:
We migrated to an open architecture in 4 months, cut our AI infrastructure costs by 60%, and now iterate 10x faster. Best decision we ever made.
Results:
Alex Patel
CTO at SupplyChain AI
Challenge:
We needed to rebuild our entire supply chain prediction system with AI, but the risk was enormous. One wrong decision could cost millions.
Solution:
We completed the transformation on schedule with no major setbacks. Our prediction accuracy improved from 72% to 94%, saving $12M annually.
Results:
David Kim
Director of AI at LogisticsFlow
Challenge:
We had attempted this project twice before, burning $5M total with nothing to show. Vague requirements led to endless revisions and vendor disputes.
Solution:
The project delivered in 6 months exactly as specified. Our routing efficiency improved 40%, and we avoided the usual $2M in scope changes.
Results:
Lisa Thompson
Head of Product at EduTech Innovations
Challenge:
We were confident in our approach until Durante's audit revealed that our data pipeline couldn't scale, our ML model was overfitted, and our vendor's architecture was proprietary.
Solution:
Our AI tutoring platform launched to 500K students without a hitch. The platform scales beautifully, and we own our technology stack.
Results:
Rachel Green
VP Engineering at MediaStream Technologies
Challenge:
We had been stuck in planning mode for 12 months, unable to decide between vendors, architectures, and approaches. Every meeting ended with more questions.
Solution:
Our recommendation engine now powers 80% of user engagement. Time-to-decision dropped from years to weeks. We're now leading our market segment.
Results:
Michael Okonkwo
CTO at InsureTech Global
Challenge:
Our claims AI was 18 months late, $8M over budget, and still didn't work. The vendor blamed us, we blamed them. The board was ready to kill the project.
Solution:
Durante rewrote the specs in 6 weeks, we switched vendors, and launched in 5 months. The system now processes 10K claims/day with 98% accuracy.
Results:
Priya Sharma
VP of Technology at BankingAI Solutions
Challenge:
Our fraud detection AI had a 40% false positive rateunusable. We'd invested $15M over 2 years and were about to write it off as a total loss.
Solution:
We rebuilt the training pipeline in 3 months. False positives dropped to 2%. The system now saves us $30M annually in fraud prevention.
Results:
James Wilson
Chief Digital Officer at ManufacturingTech Inc
Challenge:
After 2 years and $10M, our predictive maintenance AI predicted nothing. Accuracy was 35%worse than random. The CEO wanted answers, and I had none.
Solution:
We launched a scaled-down version in 3 months that actually delivered value. Now we're expanding it based on proven results. Downtime reduced 60%.
Results:
Emily Zhang
Engineering Manager at DataStream Corp
Challenge:
Solution:
Amanda Foster
Director of Engineering at FinOps Solutions
Challenge:
Solution:
Alex Patel
CTO at SupplyChain AI
Challenge:
We needed to rebuild our entire supply chain prediction system with AI, but the risk was enormous. One wrong decision could cost millions.
Solution:
We completed the transformation on schedule with no major setbacks. Our prediction accuracy improved from 72% to 94%, saving $12M annually.
Results:
Robert Martinez
Head of Innovation at CloudTech Services
Challenge:
Solution:
David Kim
Director of AI at LogisticsFlow
Challenge:
We had attempted this project twice before, burning $5M total with nothing to show. Vague requirements led to endless revisions and vendor disputes.
Solution:
The project delivered in 6 months exactly as specified. Our routing efficiency improved 40%, and we avoided the usual $2M in scope changes.
Results:
Sarah Chen
CTO at FinanceHub Inc
Challenge:
We were burning through $3M annually on failed AI initiatives. Our team was demoralized, and I was losing credibility with the board. Every vendor promised the moon but delivered chaos.
Solution:
Today, all our AI projects launch on time and on spec. Our development velocity increased 3x, and we've saved $4.5M in prevented failures. The board now sees AI as our strategic advantage.
Results:
Lisa Thompson
Head of Product at EduTech Innovations
Challenge:
We were confident in our approach until Durante's audit revealed that our data pipeline couldn't scale, our ML model was overfitted, and our vendor's architecture was proprietary.
Solution:
Our AI tutoring platform launched to 500K students without a hitch. The platform scales beautifully, and we own our technology stack.
Results:
Marcus Rodriguez
VP of Engineering at HealthTech Solutions
Challenge:
Our AI initiatives were siloed, expensive, and unpredictable. We had 4 different teams building similar solutions, wasting resources and creating technical debt.
Solution:
We now have a cohesive AI strategy, reusable components, and predictable delivery. Our time-to-market dropped from 9 months to 6 weeks for new AI features.
Results:
Rachel Green
VP Engineering at MediaStream Technologies
Challenge:
We had been stuck in planning mode for 12 months, unable to decide between vendors, architectures, and approaches. Every meeting ended with more questions.
Solution:
Our recommendation engine now powers 80% of user engagement. Time-to-decision dropped from years to weeks. We're now leading our market segment.
Results:
Jennifer Park
Chief Technology Officer at RetailAI Corp
Challenge:
We were locked into an expensive AI vendor whose solution didn't scale. Every change request cost $100K+ and took months. We felt trapped.
Solution:
We migrated to an open architecture in 4 months, cut our AI infrastructure costs by 60%, and now iterate 10x faster. Best decision we ever made.
Results:
Michael Okonkwo
CTO at InsureTech Global
Challenge:
Our claims AI was 18 months late, $8M over budget, and still didn't work. The vendor blamed us, we blamed them. The board was ready to kill the project.
Solution:
Durante rewrote the specs in 6 weeks, we switched vendors, and launched in 5 months. The system now processes 10K claims/day with 98% accuracy.
Results:
Priya Sharma
VP of Technology at BankingAI Solutions
Challenge:
Our fraud detection AI had a 40% false positive rateunusable. We'd invested $15M over 2 years and were about to write it off as a total loss.
Solution:
We rebuilt the training pipeline in 3 months. False positives dropped to 2%. The system now saves us $30M annually in fraud prevention.
Results:
James Wilson
Chief Digital Officer at ManufacturingTech Inc
Challenge:
After 2 years and $10M, our predictive maintenance AI predicted nothing. Accuracy was 35%worse than random. The CEO wanted answers, and I had none.
Solution:
We launched a scaled-down version in 3 months that actually delivered value. Now we're expanding it based on proven results. Downtime reduced 60%.
Results: